<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Photoshop High-End Retouching Tutorial Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com</link>
	<description>Retouching tutorials for Photoshop, before and after images, free RAW files &#38; much more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Photoshop CS6 Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-cs6-preview?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adobe-photoshop-cs6-preview</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-cs6-preview#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are your thoughts on the latest CS6 preview? At first glance, the interface is completely new. I did not like it initially, but after watching the video, I immediately realized how much better it is. It allows you to focus on the image at hand and everything else almost visually disappears. It would have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-cs6-preview/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fotoshop by Adobé</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/fotoshop-by-adobe?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fotoshop-by-adobe</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/fotoshop-by-adobe#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one video you have to check out. It exemplifies everything that&#8217;s wrong (or right) depending on how you look at it, about the beauty industry. It makes a complete mockery of everything that our industry does in a comedic way. Aside from that, this video was made so well. I&#8217;m surprised that no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/fotoshop-by-adobe/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recycling Old Covers: Post Processing Variations</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/recycling-old-covers-post-processing-variations?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=recycling-old-covers-post-processing-variations</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/recycling-old-covers-post-processing-variations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, the January 2012 cover of Madison Magazine recycled an image of Kate Moss from a previous issue of Vogue magazine. The talented Mario Sorrenti was behind the image. This was all done through legal means of course, without any implication of stealing the image. Although, this raises many questions. Is is okay for images [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/recycling-old-covers-post-processing-variations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photoshop Ban in the United States?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/photoshop-ban-in-the-united-states?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=photoshop-ban-in-the-united-states</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/photoshop-ban-in-the-united-states#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Procter &#38; Gamble has agreed to never again run an ad for its CoverGirl mascara because it used &#8220;enhanced post-production&#8221; and &#8220;photoshopping&#8221; to make eyelashes look thicker than they were in real life. P&#38;G agreed to the ban even though it disclosed in the ad that the image was enhanced.” &#8211; Source This is the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/photoshop-ban-in-the-united-states/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Possible Future of Retouching</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/possible-future-of-retouching?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=possible-future-of-retouching</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/possible-future-of-retouching#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, H&#38;M decided to take a new turn for their recent campaign. If you look closely, you&#8217;ll see a similarity. Notice it yet? That&#8217;s right, their poses are exactly the same. This isn&#8217;t a coincidence. “The bodies of most of the models H&#38;M features on its website are computer-generated and &#8220;completely virtual,&#8221; the company has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/possible-future-of-retouching/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Photoshop CS 6 Upgrade Policy Changes</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-upgrade-policy-changes?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adobe-photoshop-upgrade-policy-changes</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-upgrade-policy-changes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Starting with Photoshop CS6, which is anticipated to ship in 2012, Adobe will be enforcing a new upgrade policy. The existing practice is to allow customers to purchase the newest version at the upgrade price if they own an existing version up to three major releases back. To upgrade to Photoshop CS6 or any other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-photoshop-upgrade-policy-changes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perception vs. Reality: Britney Spears Reveals Her Before Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/perception-vs-reality-britney-spears-before-shots?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=perception-vs-reality-britney-spears-before-shots</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/perception-vs-reality-britney-spears-before-shots#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Britney Spears has boldly agreed for the original photos from her latest shoot for Candie&#8217;s to be released alongside the final retouched copies”. Originally posted www.marieclaire.co.uk, I give full props for Britney for allowing these to be shown. Most regular models are too afraid to show theirs, let alone a celebrity. In this image conscious world [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/perception-vs-reality-britney-spears-before-shots/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost Of Retouching</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/the-cost-of-retouching?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-cost-of-retouching</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/the-cost-of-retouching#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo District News, otherwise known as PDN, recently released an article titled, “Does Editorial Post-Production Cost Too Much?” This is one of those articles I wish came out when I first started in the industry. I really never knew how much to charge or what the earning potential really was for a retoucher. Considering the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/the-cost-of-retouching/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Vogue Goes on a Diet</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/russian-vogue-goes-on-a-diet?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=russian-vogue-goes-on-a-diet</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/russian-vogue-goes-on-a-diet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Russian Vogue featured the talented singer, Adam Levine of Maroon 5, as their cover feature along with a spread. Everything looks great till you actually get to the spread. This is where things begin to get strange. It should be pretty apparent about what went wrong. Either he has liposuction done, or the retouchers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/russian-vogue-goes-on-a-diet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe&#8217;s New Techniques at Adobe Max 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-max-2011?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adobe-max-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-max-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik Naik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Adobe is up to something big, well, at least they&#8217;re headed in the right direction with some brand new tricks. If you haven&#8217;t heard, recently at Adobe Max, they revealed something interesting. Take a look for yourself: That&#8217;s right, they&#8217;ve developed a way to deblur an image. It&#8217;s almost too good to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalphotoshopretouching.com/blog/adobe-max-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

